Another controversial third umpire decision!
— Cricket.com (@weRcricket) December 7, 2024
Pad first or bat first - it was a very close call, and it's given as bat first.
Right decision? #AUSvsINDpic.twitter.com/RFmw4Erwm6
Definitely pad first and Umpire didn't even went for ball tracking. Same old aussies cheating again!!! pic.twitter.com/jzuIqtEC4h
— Div(@div_yumm) December 7, 2024
Even if it was pad first, it would have stayed with the umpire's not out call pic.twitter.com/jQH5EaIUcD
— cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) December 7, 2024
What a joke. Hilarious. Ump was not convinced with replays today.
— Guru Gulab (@madaddie24) December 7, 2024
Australia and cheating never ending love story #INDvsAUS #INDvAUS #cheating pic.twitter.com/D9gkVvE3NK
— Vikram Chaudhary (@imvikram1807) December 7, 2024
Why are you not sure? Why can't you show this slow motion to third umpire!
That's terrible terrible technology usage!
— Nikhil (@CricCrazyNIKS) December 7, 2024
India or Australia, that's a horrible usage of technology.
Haha that review if this was indian player specially kohli it would have been pad first. But if it's an australian player so bat first.
— Archer (@poserarcher) December 7, 2024
When Indians Bat
"No Conclusive Evidence Still Decision Overturned - OUT"
When Aussies Bat
"Clear Evidence Still Decision Not Overturned - NOT OUT"
Well Played Aussies ????@CricketAus#cheating#AUSvIND #INDvsAUS
When Indians Bat
"No Conclusive Evidence Still Decision Overturned - OUT"
When Aussies Bat
"Clear Evidence Still Decision Not Overturned - NOT OUT"
Well Played Aussies @CricketAus#cheating#AUSvIND #INDvsAUS
— (@Sanitizer09) December 7, 2024